About us Login Get email updates
Quick Clip
Print

Laura Ingraham: "I'd Like For The Republicans To Be In Charge Of Everything"

June 08, 2012 12:18 am ET

From the June 7 edition of The O'Reilly Factor:

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Previously:

Fox's Laura Ingraham To Guest: If You're A Law-Abiding Muslim, "Why Would You Be Upset About What The NYPD Is Doing?"

Fox Business Host Stuart Varney: "We Must Win. I Say 'We' -- I'm A Conservative, I'm A Republican. I Say We Must Win"

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by DAWUSS (June 08, 2012 12:24 am ET)
      43  
      They were. Remember how that went?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by clearstate (June 08, 2012 12:32 am ET)
      27 1
      Republicans dream of running a totalitarian regime.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (June 08, 2012 12:40 am ET)
      23 1
      Nothing nerw. they embrace dictatorships and that is their goal. Rove already said that.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Aeval (June 08, 2012 1:24 am ET)
        17  
        No, not really dictatorship, they embrace plutocrazy.
        They want the richest comapanies in the world dictate the policy of the three branches of government.

        They already have part of the legislative, the part that's cheaper to buy, the conservatives, apparently democrats sell their idealogy at much higher price, unless they are conserative democrats of course.

        Executive, they had Reagan and both Bushes.

        Judical, "Corporations are people" Citizens United... do I have to say more?

        I cannot say with certainty that USA is a true democrazy, it doesn't feel like one.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by politeradical (June 08, 2012 1:13 pm ET)
          5 1
          "Less government in business and more business in government."
          -Warren G. Harding
          Report Abuse
        • Author by PBVV (June 08, 2012 8:58 pm ET)
          7  
          BREAKING: Romney names running mate

          The Romney campaign today announced a surprise pick for Vice President –
          ....
          When questioned by reporters about the vetting process, the spokesman said that it had been completed in a record forty eight hours ........

          ...
          A spokesman for the Obama campaign said they were not commenting on the constitutionality of this announcement until they had seen _____ ______'s birth certificate.......



          ;-D
          Report Abuse
      • Author by gmccpa (June 08, 2012 8:09 am ET)
        9 1
        Whatever we label what it is they embrace...its some kind of Authority. This is what they want. This is how they perceive the world. All should be subserviant to their views. And adopt their lifestyle.

        Ingraham says it bluntly with her words.."US should be dominant"...Republicans should be 'IN CHARGE'. Law abiding citizens shoud 'have no problem' with stop and frisk laws. etc.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by yoiksaway (June 08, 2012 12:47 am ET)
      11 1
      I think I just heard two troopers from the Death Star shouting over the din of their battle against an inconvenient guest, or I might have heard the bitter cheerleader that missed out on being prom queen, but I know I just heard Tara Dowdell attempting to speak in complete sentences while the format doesn't allow for that.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by yoiksaway (June 08, 2012 12:55 am ET)
      11 1
      "..we're out of time unfortunately, fun, fun conversation.."--bitter cheerleader

      There was no time to accomplish anything, and it was not fun, which I guess is the real format. I've seen better steamers left behind in the dog park.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nixter (June 08, 2012 1:02 am ET)
      7 1
      Laura has diaper rash, and is very confused about her roll as a convincing Obama hater, Give it up, prom date.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Quiet Tom (June 08, 2012 1:56 am ET)
      6 1
      Why do they bother having Progressive guests on their shows?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by danielsangeo (June 08, 2012 5:09 am ET)
        13 1
        So they can shout over them and never let them get a word in edgewise. That'll learn them.

        I think the better question would be, "Why do progressives bother coming on their shows?"
        Report Abuse
        • Author by foole (June 08, 2012 8:47 am ET)
          11 1
          Also too, it allows them to make themselves look like heroes to their mostly brain-dead sheeple followers. The sheeple sit on their couches watching their conservative heroes make the liberals look stupid and ineffective. It enhances their long held belief that conservatives rule and liberals drool.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by handsomejack54 (June 08, 2012 3:36 am ET)
      9 1
      What conversation? That conversation was basically Ingraham and O'Connell yelling over Dowdell.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by David2012 (June 08, 2012 7:38 am ET)
      10 1
      Anybody who goes on Fox gets exactly what they deserve.

      And nobody with any sense ever should appear on Fox. Mostly, they don't.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by MickD (June 08, 2012 9:12 am ET)
        3  
        People are desperate to get face time on TeeVee, FoxNoose yelling or not.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Maimonides 03 (June 08, 2012 7:58 am ET)
      22 1
      We had 6 years of all conservative rule and it lead to a global financial collapse, over spending and moral bankruptcy. What did we learn:

      -We know unregulated markets lead to monopolies.
      -We know that the bubble was caused by unregulated credit/default swaps, massively leveraged loans, unsecured loans and derivative trading.
      -We know having industry police itself is a failure.
      -We know appointing a person to lead who has no experience in that field is a bad idea e.g. Head of the EPA under President Bush.
      -We learned talking tough does not make you good at national security.
      -Fake wars are expensive
      -Apparently Al-Queda and bin Laden were not that important
      -How to privatize schools that fail more than public schools
      -How to privatize parts of the military and how to profit from that
      -WMDs are really hard to find when they do not exist
      -We like mercenaries
      -How to lose millions of jobs and never mention it

      Wow, I think I've learned enough from all conservative leadership.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by OldMarine (June 08, 2012 9:28 am ET)
        8 1
        Ye Gods! We can't afford to learn any more!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by jdkinpa (June 08, 2012 12:42 pm ET)
        4  
        Hope you don't mind if I borrow your well thought out and presented historical reality to attempt to enlighten some of the reality challenged conservatives I have to contend with on a daily basis.

        Thanks in advance....
        Report Abuse
    • Author by YouTubeJEFF9K (June 08, 2012 8:30 am ET)
      15 1
      The Republicans controlled everything in 1921, 1922, 1923, 1924, 1925, 1926, 1927, 1928, 1929 and 1930. The resulting Great Depression took years of Democratic control to fix.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by BlueFish (June 08, 2012 8:39 am ET)
      9 1
      Ingraham - "People are really worried that we are losing this country, that we are losing our dominance in the world . . ."

      In other words - "REPUBLICANS are worried that they are losing the White House and dominance in Congress."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by foole (June 08, 2012 8:48 am ET)
      9 1
      But, if I was paying attention the other day, by Roger Ailes calculations, wouldn't Harpy..er...Laura fall into the "liberal" employee category.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bintx (June 08, 2012 8:49 am ET)
      14 3
      In other words, this authoritarian wants a totalitarian government with no dissent. That's how it works when the authoritarians take over.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by 1949vet (June 08, 2012 9:22 am ET)
      12 1
      So typical. Progressive guest outnumbered by conservatives, a long spiel of Republican talking points & ridiculous accusations, ask guest to respond, then immediately, continuously and loudly interrupt guest, who never gets a chance to fully respond.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by blk-in-alabam (June 08, 2012 9:38 am ET)
      6 2
      One day Laura Ingraham is going to get that fight with a smart black woman that she always pretends to want...When this happens no one will be holding either of them back.And Laura Igraham's dumb as will get well whipped both mentally,and physically.............

      Laura Ingraham admitted on her radio show that she knows that she is a dumb as...Laura Ingraham said she never studied or work hard in school...Laura Ingraham said that she "always" found a "smart boy" she could smile at,and make him do her school work from grade school to college....Something that most likely carries over into her professional career life
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Jimijams (June 08, 2012 9:38 am ET)
      4 1
      Then that would not be a democracy.
      Laura why do you hate America so much.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by eglot (June 08, 2012 9:51 am ET)
      3 1
      I'd like for Laura Ingraham to be attractive. Neither is going to happen.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by blk-in-alabam (June 08, 2012 9:57 am ET)
        2 3
        Laura Ingraham did the bleached blonde thing.Because the way she actually looks,like Ms Jane on the Beverly Hillbillies is against everything that she pretends to be
        Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (June 08, 2012 10:01 am ET)
      5 1
      Actually, so would I.

      Why? Because then we can see what a large house of cards that they really have in their ideas. On a different note though, I think it would be really bad for our country overall, so maybe I don't want them in control of everything.

      Because last time they were, we got involved in 2 land wars in Asia, destroyed the budget surplus, and ran up an additional 10 trillion in debt.

      So...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by everettbme (June 08, 2012 10:36 am ET)
      4 1
      Be careful what you wish. Seeing as how laura is supposedly a women, if republicans were in charge of everything, she would probably never be allowed out of her house (or the house she is living in since women would not be allowed to own anything like a house).
      Report Abuse
      • Author by chazmanr (June 08, 2012 1:01 pm ET)
        1 1
        Faux News peroxide bimbo is an acceptable alternative to barefoot and pregnant.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (June 08, 2012 11:18 am ET)
         
      Sure. Look how well that worked out last time.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (June 08, 2012 4:28 pm ET)
        1  
        That 6 years didn't exist. Forget about it. You are getting sleepy--
        Report Abuse
    • Author by bryansipho (June 08, 2012 12:08 pm ET)
      1  
      Facts. Pesky things.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jdkinpa (June 08, 2012 12:39 pm ET)
      1 1
      I swear; I see these debates as the setups for the 'good guy' vs 'bad guy' of professional wrestling matches.

      They bring in some rookie 'strategist'. Have a meeting before the match in the 'green room'. Had out a script, do a walk threw, and then go before the camera and pretend that it's real.

      At least in professional wrestling there are times when the 'rookie' maybe goes of script and some real blood is shed.

      And if the 'rookie' happens to be black, then all the better.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by SMTDL (June 08, 2012 1:03 pm ET)
      3 1
      Is that a Patriotic comment?She is wishing for totalitarianism,plutocracy,facism??Isn't that anti-American?Will she be taken off the air by the Patriots?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by politeradical (June 08, 2012 1:09 pm ET)
      4 1
      Because that worked out so well last time. See 2001-2009 you twit.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by davemccarthymusic9410 (June 08, 2012 3:12 pm ET)
      1 1
      well they're certainly in charge of HER...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by scooter51 (June 08, 2012 3:32 pm ET)
        1
      And Laura, I'd like to never have to hear your whining puling voice ever again. How's that working out? Not so well as long as you still draw breath.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rtwmd1230 (June 08, 2012 3:33 pm ET)
      2 1
      Including your uterus?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Vryus (June 08, 2012 4:03 pm ET)
      5 1
      She does realize that if the current Right Wing was in charge of everything, then she would essentially become a piece of livestock?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (June 08, 2012 4:30 pm ET)
        1 1
        Sheep? Goat? Cow? Pig? I assume domestic livestock. I'm thinking goose or a chicken, pref the ones that squawk all the time for no reason.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by captaincrunch (June 08, 2012 5:09 pm ET)
      1  
      They were, from 2001-2006. It was a complete disaster!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by beentheredonethat (June 10, 2012 11:20 am ET)
         
      I'd like the republicans to be in charge of nothing!
      Report Abuse

Most Popular Tags

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube Reddit